Klimaschutzszenario 95 (KS95)

Name of the study Klimaschutzszenario 2050. 2. Endbericht
Author, Institution Julia Repenning, Lukas Emele, Ruth Blanck, Hannes Böttcher, Günter Dehoust, Hannah Förster, Benjamin Greiner, Ralph Harthan, Klaus Henneberg, Hauke Hermann, Wolfram Jörß, Charlotte Loreck, Sylive Ludig, Felix Chri. Matthes, Margarethe Scheffler, Katja Schumachen, Kirsten Wiegmann, Carina Zell-Ziegler, Sibylle Braungardt, Wolfgang Eichhammer, Rainer Elsland, Tobias Fleiter, Johannes Hartwig, Judit Kockat, Ben Pfluger, Wolfgang Schade, Barbara Schlomann, Frank Sensfuß, Hans-Joachim Ziesing
Client Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit
Source of funding public
Citation reference
Citation doi https://www.oeko.de/oekodoc/2451/2015-608-de.pdf
Aim -
New aspects -
Spatial / Geographical coverage Germany
Time frame 2020, 2030, 2050
target year
transformation path
Modeled energy sectors electricity, heat, liquid fuels, gas
Modeled demand sectors households, industry, commercial sector, transport
Economic (behavioural) rationale -
Technologies included PV, wind, hydro, biomass, biogas, solar thermal, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True, True
Economic focuses included -
Social focuses included -
Endogenous variables -
Sensitivities
Technologies included 5 year time steps
Exogenous time series used -
Technical data + usage -
Social data -
Economical data -
Ecological data -
Pre-Processing -
Name of the Scenario Klimaschutzszenario 95 (KS95)
Energy savingsnot estimated
Potential energy savingnot estimated
Emission reductionsnot estimated
Share RE (heat sector)not estimated
Share RE (mobility sector)not estimated
Share RE (power sector)not estimated
Share RE (total energy supply)not estimated
Cost development -
Technological innovations -
Potential wind -
Potential solar electric -
Potential solar thermal -
Potential biomass -
Potential geothermal -
Potential hydro power -
Social developement See tables ksz2050_r2_ks95_parameters_assumptions
Economic development See tables ksz2050_r2_ks95_parameters_assumptions
Development of environmental aspects See tables ksz2050_r2_ks95_###_emissions_###
Post-processing
Further assumptions for post-processing
Uncertainty assessment -
Robustness -
Comparability / Validation -
Conclusions -

If you find bugs or if you have ideas to improve the Open Energy Platform, you are welcome to add your comments to the existing issues on GitHub.
You can also fork the project and get involved.

Please note that the platform is still under construction and therefore the design of this page is still highly volatile!



Fact Sheet objectives: The Fact Sheets are made to...
  • Find models/frameworks for your needs or just get an overview about the existing ones
  • Compare a selection of models for different purposes - e.g. to develop a strategy to link them
  • Store your model/framework information to provide transparency
More info here
Use case example model Fact Sheet: For a European pathway simulation (EPS) we want to choose the models that best meet our requirements. All partners include their models in the Model Fact Sheets and tag them with “EPS”. To compare the models we filter all “EPS” models and choose different characteristics that we want to compare. OEP will give us tables (views) that facilitate the comparison.